Pitch Reviews

Share this post
Can Ultra Premium Eyewear at Half the Price Really Shake Up Warby Parker's $6B Market Share?
www.pitchreviews.com

Can Ultra Premium Eyewear at Half the Price Really Shake Up Warby Parker's $6B Market Share?

Scott Kitun
Oct 21, 2021
4
Share this post
Can Ultra Premium Eyewear at Half the Price Really Shake Up Warby Parker's $6B Market Share?
www.pitchreviews.com

The Rules:

Every week I breakdown startup pitches with the added hook that you can invest whether you’re accredited or not (if you don't know what that means, click here).

I base my review on a 3-minute founder pitch and some light diligence.

My a scoring system is not a validation of idea, or grading for likelihood of success. It just means, all things being equal at launch — this startup has these boxes checked.

What I look for:

  1. Founder — ability to lead, sell into and influence a given market

  2. Idea — is it inevitable or solving a BIG problem in a scaleable way

  3. TAM — how big is the total addressable market

  4. Traction — do they have meaningful early traction

  5. Unfair Advantage — do they have a competitive edge


★★★☆☆

Company Overview

MicroVision Optical is a long-time eyewear OEM now launching a D2C brand called, Parallel 👉 Watch The Pitch 📺

Key People: David Johnson (2x exits), Ray Sphire (1 exit), & David Stern

Traction: MicroVision is not a typical startup, they’re already a successful eyewear OEM that’s shipped more than 1,000,000 units worldwide. Now they’re shifting to a D2C model that targets a $20B market dominated by only a few players. MVO is generating $1.5M ARR, with 72% profit margins and believe their supply chain advantage will allow them to undercut the market.

Terms & Takeaway

Invest in MicroVision Optical here 👉 Term Sheet

Security Type: Reg CF
Pre-Money Valuation: $4,500,000
Raised (as of publishing): $286,225
Minimum Investment: $100.00

Here's what I like: This team is stout. Between the previous brand building and management experience I have little doubt they can be successful spinning up an attractive brand that will sell well through existing retail channels. I also like the concept of using existing infrastructure to build a secondary brand that has even better margins — Warby Parker has proven the D2C eyewear model can compete (and excel). I also think given the inventory expense and marketing spend needed, a $4.5M Value Cap is really fair.

Here's what I don't love: This market is extraordinarily competitive, in order to win, or even chip away at Warby Parker, the online strategy is going to need to be top level. I have zero doubt the founders can build a brand, but doing so online with today’s NFT, meme and TikTok attention span — I have a few questions. The product quality speaks for itself and the retail distribution will certainly help; but success and failure will rest entirely on the shoulders of strong social/paid and influencer marketing.

Who should invest and why: If you like backing great founders and would love to score a pair of nice shades or readers, I’d throw some money at this deal. Also, eyewear is one of those products that are priced for prestige — so while I’m not sure undercutting price will move the intended user — adding some competitive balance to the market would be a welcome change!

As always, startup investing is super high risk, anything can happen.

Invest in MicroVision Optical here 👉 Term Sheet

Questions, DM me 🤳 @kitun.


Disclaimer: It goes without saying, but this information should not be constituted as financial advice, my investing opinions are my own and all diligence is the responsibility of each individual investor.
Share this post
Can Ultra Premium Eyewear at Half the Price Really Shake Up Warby Parker's $6B Market Share?
www.pitchreviews.com
Comments
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 KingsCrowd, Inc.
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing